🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are more and more allowing the far right to set the public discourse, as per a recent study carried out in Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Two Decades of Media Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German publications.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core subjects like integration and migration, established parties increasingly adapted their communication in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political discourse by mainstream political groups plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," explained a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The impact was evident even when mainstream groups were criticising the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is key."

Normalisation Effect Throughout the Continent

While the study was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to nations across the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another researcher. "The far right makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're countering it, you're echoing it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also toughened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a former German chancellor advocated large-scale deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar examples can be observed throughout Europe, as politicians from nations including the UK to the French Republic embrace the language of the far right, especially on migration.

This has created an echo chamber that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," explained a researcher.

Some parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict platform of the radical right, even as studies suggests that doing so leads voters to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of information collected revealed that the impact of radical parties had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "But if you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The research highlighted the need for mainstream political parties to carve out their own narratives, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."