🔗 Share this article

While dawn illuminated the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, negotiators remained stuck in a enclosed conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in difficult discussions, with numerous ministers representing multiple blocs of countries from the most vulnerable nations to the wealthiest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as weary delegates confronted the grim reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The 30th UN climate conference hovered near the brink of total collapse.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

Scientific evidence has shown for well over a century, the carbon dioxide produced by utilizing fossil fuels is heating up our planet to dangerous levels.

Yet, during more than three decades of annual climate meetings, the crucial requirement to cease fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a decision made two years ago at the Dubai climate summit to "transition away from fossil fuels". Representatives from the Middle Eastern nations, Russia, and several other countries were adamant this would not occur another time.

Increasing pressure for change

At the same time, a growing number of countries were equally determined that movement on this issue was crucially important. They had formulated a proposal that was attracting increasing support and made it clear they were prepared to hold firm.

Emerging economies strongly sought to advance on securing financial assistance to help them cope with the already disastrous impacts of environmental crises.

Critical moment

By the early hours of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to leave and trigger failure. "It was on the edge for us," commented one government representative. "I was prepared to walk away."

The critical development came through talks with Saudi Arabia. Near 6am, senior representatives left the main group to hold a closed-door meeting with the chief Saudi negotiator. They encouraged language that would indirectly acknowledge the global commitment to "shift from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Surprising consensus

As opposed to explicitly namechecking fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the UAE consensus". Following reflection, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly accepted the wording.

The room expressed relief. Cheers erupted. The settlement was completed.

With what became known as the "Belém political package", the world took another small step towards the phaseout of fossil fuels – a faltering, insufficient step that will scarcely affect the climate's ongoing trajectory towards disaster. But nevertheless a important shift from complete stagnation.

Important aspects of the agreement

• In addition to the oblique commitment in the official document, countries will commence creating a plan to systematically reduce fossil fuels
• This will be largely a non-binding program led by Brazil that will deliver findings next year
• Addressing the necessary cuts in greenhouse gas emissions to stay within the 1.5C limit was also put off to next year
• Developing countries obtained a threefold increase to $120bn of annual finance to help them adapt to the impacts of climate disasters
• This sum will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "just transition mechanism" to help people working in high-carbon industries transition to the sustainable sector

Differing opinions

As the world teeters on the brink of climate "critical thresholds" that could eliminate habitats and force whole regions into disorder, the agreement was far from the "giant leap" needed.

"Cop30 gave us some baby steps in the correct path, but given the severity of the climate crisis, it has failed to rise to the occasion," warned one environmental analyst.

This flawed deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the political challenges – including a American leader who shunned the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the rising tide of nationalist politics, continuing wars in multiple regions, intolerable levels of inequality, and global economic instability.

"The climate arsonists – the fossil fuel giants – were ultimately in the spotlight at the climate summit," comments one policy convener. "We have crossed a threshold on that. The platform is accessible. Now we must turn it into a actual pathway to a protected environment."

Significant divisions revealed

While nations were able to celebrate the gavelling through of the deal, Cop30 also revealed significant divisions in the primary worldwide framework for tackling the climate crisis.

"International summits are unanimity-required, and in a era of geopolitical divides, agreement is increasingly difficult to reach," stated one senior UN official. "It would be dishonest to claim that these talks has provided all that is needed. The disparity between where we are and what research requires remains alarmingly large."

Should the world is to avert the most severe impacts of climate collapse, the international negotiations alone will fall far short.